Homegrown theorizing: knowledge, scholars, theory

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKuru, Deniz
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-08T21:51:32Z
dc.date.available2021-01-08T21:51:32Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentTAÜ, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, the discipline of International Relations (IR) has entered another of its turns: the homegrown turn. This new turn focuses on possible contributions to IR theorizing using non-Western knowledge and/or scholarship. This article deconstructs the idea of homegrown theorizing by focusing on its constitutive part, dealing separately with the aspects of knowledge, scholar, and theory, questioning thereby the differing meanings of homegrownness. Such an approach provides an initial framework that accomplishes two things: First, the paper discusses today's core Western IR community and its disciplinary sociology in terms of the main factors engendering present critiques of its scholarship. Second, it then becomes possible to pay attention to peripheral non-Western IR's position at a time of gradual post-Westernization, both world politically and within the discipline. Engaging with the pitfalls of Western IR and elaborating on the reasons not only explains the emergence of IR's homegrown turn, but also provides the basis for understanding how scholars engaging in homegrown theorizing can learn from the (past) mistakes of core scholarship. Dealing with the impact of globalization, Eurocentrism, presentism, and parochialism as the main problem areas of (Western) IR, the article concludes by providing a list of lessons to be taken into account when engaging in homegrown theorizing within the periphery.
dc.identifier.doi10.20991/allazimuth.321993
dc.identifier.endpage86en_US
dc.identifier.issn2146-7757
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85040091846
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage69en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid274079
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.321993
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12846/343
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000429166100004
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.institutionauthorKuru, Deniz
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCenter for Foreign Policy and Peace Research, Ihsan Dogramaci Peace Foundation
dc.relation.ispartofAll Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectDisciplinary sociologyen_US
dc.subjectHomegrown theorizingen_US
dc.subjectNon-Western IRen_US
dc.subjectPost-Western IRen_US
dc.titleHomegrown theorizing: knowledge, scholars, theory
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
0343.pdf
Boyut:
288.29 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu