Is it time for a new approach in the cooptation practice? (cooptation as it is foreseen in art. 363/1 of the tcc)

Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim

Tarih

2017

Dergi Başlığı

Dergi ISSN

Cilt Başlığı

Yayıncı

Istanbul Univ, Fac Law

Erişim Hakkı

info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess

Özet

Legal term of cooptation is understood as the possibility of the organs of a juristic person to elect its own members. In case of joint-stock companies cooptation is foreseen in Art. 363/1 TCC and can be used to refill a vacated membership of the board of directors by the board itself. Institution of cooptation in turkish law is so far constrictive implemented. Cooptatiton is a tool to avoid lacking of organs of corporations. However; in turkish law it was and still is recognized and implemented as an instrument of completion of number of the board of directors in joint- stock companies. In our opinion the hitherto existing doctrine and practice on cooptation is questionable since we have a new commercial code. Due to the system of the new code and the purpose of the related article cooptation should be allowed, even if the board of directors consists of one person upon current vacancies.

Açıklama

WOS:000409940900010

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cooptation, Board Of Directors Of A Joint Stock Company, Election Of The Members Of The Board Of Directors, Cooptation In Swiss, German, French, English And Us-American Law

Kaynak

Journal Of Istanbul University Law Faculty-Hukuk Fakultesi Mecmuasi

WoS Q Değeri

N/A

Scopus Q Değeri

Cilt

75

Sayı

1

Künye