An Application for Aggregating the Criteria Weights Obtained by Different Objective Weighting Methods and Their Use in COPRAS
| dc.contributor.author | Özdemir, Mehmet Hakan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-07T16:18:35Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-07T16:18:35Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.department | TAÜ, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İşletme Bölümü | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Multi-criteria? decision? making? (MCDM)? refers? to? a? group? of? techniques? for?assessing? a? set? of? alternatives?in?light? of? several,? usually conflicting criteria. Thus,?given?a?set?of?alternatives?(options)?and?a?number of?decision?criteria,?the?purpose of?MCDM?is?to?provide?a?choice,?ranking,? description,? classification,? sorting,? and,? in? most? instances,? an? order? of? alternatives,?from?the?most?preferred?to?the?least?favored option. (Mulliner? et?al.,?2016).?Assigning?weights?to?criteria?is?a?crucial?step?that?needs?to?be? reconsidered?in?the?majority?of?MCDM?models.?However,?one?of?the?main? issues? with? MCDM? is? figuring? out? how? to? weight? the? various? criteria? (Pamu?ar et?al.? 2018;?Vinogradova et? al.,? 2018).?The? assessment? of?the? criteria? weights? can? be subjective,? objective? or? hybrid (Ginevi?ius and Podvezko,?2005).?The?subjective?methods?calculate?weights?in?accordance? with?the? preferences? of? decision?makers? for?the? criteria.?The? opinion? or? intuition? of? the? decision? maker? is? reflected? in? weights? created? using? subjective?methods.?Due?to?lack?of?information?or?experience,?the?decision? maker?may?impact?the?findings?of?analyses?or?the?rankings?of?alternatives? based? on? weights (Ma? et? al.,? 1999).? Furthermore,? determining? the? subjective weights for?the?criteria takes?a?lot? of?time,? particularly?when? there?is? disagreement? among?the? decision?makers? regarding?the?issue? at? hand? (Odu,? 2019). On? the? contrary, the? objective? methods? calculate? weights?on?the?basis?of?objective?data?(e.g.?decision?matrix).?However,?by? using? mathematical? models? to? generate? weights,? objective? methods? frequently? ignore? the? decision? maker's? subjective? judgment (Ma? et? al.,? 1999). The?question?of?how?completely?and?objectively?the?small?sample? of?alternative?traits?conveys?the?value?of?the?criteria?is?also?left?unanswered? for? these? methodologies.? Obviously,? the? decision matrix? entirely? determines? the? outcome (Mukhametzyanov,? 2021). In? hybrid? methods,? subjective?and?objective?weighting?methods?are?combined.?The?decision? matrix?data?and?the?preferences?of?the?decision?makers?can?both?be?used?in? the?hybrid?methods?(Keshavarz-Ghorabaee?et?al. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Özdemir, Mehmet H. (2023). International Academic Research and Reviews in Social, Human and Administrative Sciences March 2023 içerisinde An Application for Aggregating the Criteria Weights Obtained by Different Objective Weighting Methods and Their Use in COPRAS. Serüven Yayınevi, 141-154. | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 154 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 141 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12846/1545 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Serüven Yayınevi | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | International Academic Research and Reviews in Social, Human and Administrative Sciences March 2023 | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Kitap Bölümü - Ulusal | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.title | An Application for Aggregating the Criteria Weights Obtained by Different Objective Weighting Methods and Their Use in COPRAS | |
| dc.type | Book Part |
