An Application for Aggregating the Criteria Weights Obtained by Different Objective Weighting Methods and Their Use in COPRAS
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2023
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Serüven Yayınevi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Multi-criteria? decision? making? (MCDM)? refers? to? a? group? of? techniques? for?assessing? a? set? of? alternatives?in?light? of? several,? usually conflicting criteria. Thus,?given?a?set?of?alternatives?(options)?and?a?number of?decision?criteria,?the?purpose of?MCDM?is?to?provide?a?choice,?ranking,? description,? classification,? sorting,? and,? in? most? instances,? an? order? of? alternatives,?from?the?most?preferred?to?the?least?favored option. (Mulliner? et?al.,?2016).?Assigning?weights?to?criteria?is?a?crucial?step?that?needs?to?be? reconsidered?in?the?majority?of?MCDM?models.?However,?one?of?the?main? issues? with? MCDM? is? figuring? out? how? to? weight? the? various? criteria? (Pamu?ar et?al.? 2018;?Vinogradova et? al.,? 2018).?The? assessment? of?the? criteria? weights? can? be subjective,? objective? or? hybrid (Ginevi?ius and Podvezko,?2005).?The?subjective?methods?calculate?weights?in?accordance? with?the? preferences? of? decision?makers? for?the? criteria.?The? opinion? or? intuition? of? the? decision? maker? is? reflected? in? weights? created? using? subjective?methods.?Due?to?lack?of?information?or?experience,?the?decision? maker?may?impact?the?findings?of?analyses?or?the?rankings?of?alternatives? based? on? weights (Ma? et? al.,? 1999).? Furthermore,? determining? the? subjective weights for?the?criteria takes?a?lot? of?time,? particularly?when? there?is? disagreement? among?the? decision?makers? regarding?the?issue? at? hand? (Odu,? 2019). On? the? contrary, the? objective? methods? calculate? weights?on?the?basis?of?objective?data?(e.g.?decision?matrix).?However,?by? using? mathematical? models? to? generate? weights,? objective? methods? frequently? ignore? the? decision? maker's? subjective? judgment (Ma? et? al.,? 1999). The?question?of?how?completely?and?objectively?the?small?sample? of?alternative?traits?conveys?the?value?of?the?criteria?is?also?left?unanswered? for? these? methodologies.? Obviously,? the? decision matrix? entirely? determines? the? outcome (Mukhametzyanov,? 2021). In? hybrid? methods,? subjective?and?objective?weighting?methods?are?combined.?The?decision? matrix?data?and?the?preferences?of?the?decision?makers?can?both?be?used?in? the?hybrid?methods?(Keshavarz-Ghorabaee?et?al.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynak
International Academic Research and Reviews in Social, Human and Administrative Sciences March 2023
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
Sayı
Künye
Özdemir, Mehmet H. (2023). International Academic Research and Reviews in Social, Human and Administrative Sciences March 2023 içerisinde An Application for Aggregating the Criteria Weights Obtained by Different Objective Weighting Methods and Their Use in COPRAS. Serüven Yayınevi, 141-154.
