A comparative legal View of the Process Materials and Audit Scope of the Appeal Procedure in Germany and Turkey

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorUnal Kaya, Hilal
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-20T08:42:25Z
dc.date.available2025-02-20T08:42:25Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentTürk-Alman Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIn comparison to German law, appeals are still young in Turkey. In Turkey,the courts of appeal only began operating in 2016. There are significant differencesbetween the Turkish and German appeal systems, particularly with regard to the scopeof the search for the truth. The extent to which the Turkish and German appellatecourts are authorized to review first-instance judgments and the point at which newfacts should be admissible on appeal are key questions in this study. The Germanappellate system with its long history will help to answer these questions in Turkish law.
dc.identifier.issn0928-9801
dc.identifier.issn1875-8371
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12846/1682
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001343068900007
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.institutionauthorUnal Kaya, Hilal
dc.language.isogr
dc.publisherKluwer Law Int
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Review of Private Law
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250220
dc.titleA comparative legal View of the Process Materials and Audit Scope of the Appeal Procedure in Germany and Turkey
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu