Yazar "Pembeci, Nil" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
  • [ X ]
    Öğe
    Anayasa mahkemesine bireysel başvuruda kabul edilebilirlik kriteri olarak : kişi bakımından yetki
    (Türk-Alman Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2025) Pembeci, Nil
    It is a common tendency to equate the criterion of ratione personae jurisdiction in individual applications with the concept of victim status. However, ratione personae jurisdiction requires a multilayered assessment that includes not only victim status but also locus standi and the public authority against which the application is directed. In this study, the Constitutional Court’s approach to the criterion of ratione personae jurisdiction is examined through a doctrinal and case law analysis within the framework of existing legal regulations and the criticisms directed at their implementation. In this context, certain groups of natural persons whose capacity to apply is debatable have been addressed, and the capacity of legal entities to apply has been examined. Accordingly, the systematic exclusion of public law legal entities from the access of individual application mechanism and the limitation imposed on private law legal entities to lodge an application only in respect of rights pertaining to their own legal personality, thereby preventing associations, foundations, and trade unions from submitting applications on behalf of their members or in the public interest, are discussed in detail. Additionally, in this context, criticism has been raised against the Court’s practice whereby the capacity to bring proceedings of private legal entities is assessed by subjecting them to a kind of “public-connection test”. Finally, considering the growing importance of inter court dialogue in human rights adjudication, the study provides a general overview of how the European, Inter-American, and African human rights courts approach the ratione personae criterion, thereby aiming to reassess the problematic aspects of the Constitutional Court’s approach to this criterion in light of the diverse approaches adopted by regional human rights courts.