Yazar "Kuru, Deniz" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 7 / 7
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Historicising eurocentrism and anti-eurocentrism in IR: a revisionist account of disciplinary self-reflexivity(Cambridge Univ Press, 2016) Kuru, DenizThe role of Eurocentrism in International Relations (IR) has become a focal point for critical scholarship. However, anti-Eurocentric scholars tend to overlook the extent to which Eurocentrism is a tempo-spatial phenomenon whose roots and development need to be analysed in a way that takes its internal differences into account. This article rejects a single notion of Eurocentrism, proposing instead to understand Eurocentrism through its three forms: historical-contextual, ideological, and residual. This differentiation can provide a means for dealing with the challenges of Eurocentrism in a more self-reflexive manner without seeing it as omnipresent and unchanging. It also offers to approach Eurocentric IR from a perspective that considers the role of historiographical differences in understanding the rise of European powers. This means that IR cannot base its explanatory frameworks on a single (the) historical record. Understanding the limits of Eurocentrism and of anti-Eurocentrism provides a better means for dealing with the formers problematic impact on IR scholarship.Öğe Homegrown theorizing Knowledge, scholars, theory(Routledge, 2018) Kuru, Deniz[No abstract available]Öğe Homegrown theorizing: Knowledge, scholars, theory(Taylor and Francis, 2018) Kuru, Deniz[No abstract available]Öğe Homegrown theorizing: knowledge, scholars, theory(Center for Foreign Policy and Peace Research, Ihsan Dogramaci Peace Foundation, 2018) Kuru, DenizIn recent years, the discipline of International Relations (IR) has entered another of its turns: the homegrown turn. This new turn focuses on possible contributions to IR theorizing using non-Western knowledge and/or scholarship. This article deconstructs the idea of homegrown theorizing by focusing on its constitutive part, dealing separately with the aspects of knowledge, scholar, and theory, questioning thereby the differing meanings of homegrownness. Such an approach provides an initial framework that accomplishes two things: First, the paper discusses today's core Western IR community and its disciplinary sociology in terms of the main factors engendering present critiques of its scholarship. Second, it then becomes possible to pay attention to peripheral non-Western IR's position at a time of gradual post-Westernization, both world politically and within the discipline. Engaging with the pitfalls of Western IR and elaborating on the reasons not only explains the emergence of IR's homegrown turn, but also provides the basis for understanding how scholars engaging in homegrown theorizing can learn from the (past) mistakes of core scholarship. Dealing with the impact of globalization, Eurocentrism, presentism, and parochialism as the main problem areas of (Western) IR, the article concludes by providing a list of lessons to be taken into account when engaging in homegrown theorizing within the periphery.Öğe Not international relations' 'mare nostrum': on the divergence between the Mediterranean and the discipline of International relations(Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2019) Kuru, DenizThis study analyzes the (dis)connections between the Mediterranean and the discipline of International Relations (IR) by focusing on their interactions from two distinct but complementary perspectives. First, a comparative analysis of leading academic IR journals both from the most active IR scholarly communities (American/global, European, British) and across the northern/European Mediterranean region (Spain, France, Italy, Croatia, and Turkey) looks to what extent topics related to the Mediterranean have found a place in these publications. Second, it offers a more disciplinary analysis that considers the reasons of IR's lacking engagement with the Mediterranean, pointing to the discipline's historical and sociological development that hindered a greater role for this significant region in IR theories and empirics. The study concludes by discussing the possibility of a Mediterranean IR theory that would consider the region's distinct world historical role while pointing to the constraints faced by such an alternative theoretical framework.Öğe Roundtable discussion on homegrown theorizing(Center Foreign Policy & Peace Research, 2018) Aydınlı Ersel; Aydın, Mustafa; Baran, Emre; Makarychev, Andrey; Smith, Karen; Gözen, Ramazan; Mallavarapu, Siddharth; Kuru, Deniz[Özet Yok]Öğe Who f(o)unded IR: American philanthropies and the discipline of international relations in Europe(Sage Publications Ltd, 2017) Kuru, DenizThis article aims to present a history of International Relations (IR) that looks at the role of three big American foundations (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Rockefeller, and Ford foundations) in the development of IR as an academic field in continental Europe. Its framework goes beyond the usual disciplinary history narratives that focus on IR's US or UK trajectories, pointing instead to American foundations' interwar and early post-World War II influence on French and German IR. The cases emphasize US foundations' interactions with European scholars and international scholarly organizations as major factors shaping IR's developmental pathways. This study offers a way to consider foundations' role in IR's gradual academic institutionalization by connecting disciplinary historical approaches to disciplinary sociology. Its sociologically conscious position underlines the significance of American philanthropies in a historical narrative and recognizes the relevance of transnational dynamics by going beyond usual emphases on ideas and national contexts.
