Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKöroğlu, Anıl
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-08T21:51:20Z
dc.date.available2021-01-08T21:51:20Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2636-7734
dc.identifier.issn2667-6974
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2020.78.1.0005
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12846/154
dc.descriptionWOS:000531015700006en_US
dc.description.abstractTo revitalize the concordat process which has lost its importance for various reasons in recent years, some amendments have been made in the provisions of the Turkish Code of Enforcement and Bankruptcy (IIK) by Law No 7101. One of the amendments is to regulate the results of the definitive period in terms of pledged creditors in a separate article (Article 295 of the Turkish IIK). Under the first paragraph of Article 295 of the Turkish Code of Enforcement and Bankruptcy, pledges may initiate debt collection by realising pledged property during the definitive period; but no protection measures can be taken and the sale by auction of the pledged property cannot be realized. Prior to the amendment to Law No 7101, a similar provision was included in the Turkish Code of Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law. However, the prohibition on the sale by auction of pledged goods issued in the new article should be examined within the framework of other articles amended by Law No 7101. In this study, the prohibition of the sale by auction of pledged goods within the definitive period is examined, which has important results in terms of the concordat process. In this study, the purpose and scope of prohibition are taken into consideration in terms of the time period. When considering the scope of prohibition in terms of a person, especially in the case of pledge on the assets of the third party in favor of the concordat debtor, the issue of whether the prohibition of auction by sale applies to the pledged property of the third party was discussed and the opinions of Turkish and Swiss jurists were evaluated. As a result of this study, it was concluded that prohibition also exists for the third party pledged goods.en_US
dc.language.isoturen_US
dc.publisherIstanbul Univ, Fac Lawen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPledgeen_US
dc.subjectDebt Collection By Realising Pledged Propertyen_US
dc.subjectConcordat Perioden_US
dc.subjectPledge On The Assets Of The Third Partyen_US
dc.titleProhibition of the sale by auction of the pledged goods within the period of the concordaten_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalIstanbul Hukuk Mecmuasien_US
dc.identifier.volume78en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.contributor.departmentTAÜ, Hukuk Fakültesi, Özel Hukuk Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKöroğlu, Anıl
dc.identifier.doi10.26650/mecmua.2020.78.1.0005
dc.identifier.startpage139en_US
dc.identifier.endpage160en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster